Your web-browser is very outdated, and as such, this website may not display properly. Please consider upgrading to a modern, faster and more secure browser. Click here to do so.
U Didn’t Build That by MC ‘Bama
Possibly one of the best video mashups we’ve seen in the highly contentious “Obama speeches set to classic jams” field. Best part: J. Granholm getting down with the get down at 1:40.
Aaaand the song stuck in my head for the rest of the day is…
416 notes (via stfuconservatives & current)
NEW YORK (The Borowitz Report)—In what his campaign described today as a bold strategy to insure victory in the Presidential contest, Republican nominee Mitt Romney will undergo a procedure to have his mouth wired shut until Tuesday, November 6th.
The decision reportedly was made in response to the release earlier in the day of rare video footage showing Mr. Romney saying what he really thinks.
In the video, Mr. Romney blasts the American people for being “insanely obsessed with food, clothing, and shelter,” and asserts that many of them are “too lazy to hide their money overseas.”
At another point in the video, Mr. Romney refers to his own hardscrabble childhood: “I was never handed anything in life. If I wanted to cut a gay kid’s hair off, I had to pin him to the ground myself.”
Romney campaign aides were upbeat about the mouth-wiring procedure today, with some saying they wished they had thought of it months ago.
When asked about the procedure at a campaign stop in Ohio, Mr. Romney said, “Mmmnff ffnn mmfff nnnnnff.”
2 notes (via iphisquandary)
I honestly can’t see why anyone would support this douche bag. Even right wingers called him out on his failure to thank the troops for their sacrifices during his RNC speech. And his defense when he’s called out by Fox News? That his speech isn’t “a laundry list” and he only included “what was important.” This guy is so fucking arrogant and selfish and dickish I can’t even. Michelle Obama and Barack Obama went out of their way to not only thank the troops and mention their sacrifices, but also to tell stories about soldiers and their families. They took a good chunk of time out of their speeches for something they obviously feel is “important.”
Romney’s failure to thank the troops is inexcusable. And at the very least, he could have said something a lot better in his defense than it not being “important.” Of course it’s important! The vast majority of Americans don’t see the line of fire, will never have to leave the comfort of their country to fight in these wars, can easily forget that this violence is happening, and can turn a blind eye to the young people our nation is sacrificing. If we aren’t reminded of the hardships the military faces, will we ever end these wars? Will we ever learn from our mistakes? And even if you are pro-war, pro-military, pro-whatever, you would have to agree that not acknowledging the hard work of the individuals in our military is deeply problematic. This man is just arrogance personified.
6 notes (via iphisquandary)
Meanwhile, if Romney wins, Obama will actually pay less taxes! These facts are just amazingly indicative of what this election means. We elect Romney and the wealthiest people in our country halve their taxes (assuming Romney’s plan gets through Congress). We elect Obama, who is way more in touch with the American people, and the wealthy, including himself, pay more. People talk as if all politicians are hypocrites, but these facts tell an important story. Obama sees himself as wealthy and he applies his politics and beliefs to himself. He not only talks the talk, but walks the walk.
Well, this is depressing. People actually think some “ums” and “ahs” should completely discredit a president. People commenting on the video actually call Obama a “bad speaker” based on manipulated snippets lasting less than a minute long. Obama surely has his weaknesses, but public speaking isn’t one of them. I’m guessing most of the people who find this video so damning were too young (or biased) to notice when President Bush’s embarrassing gaffs and mistakes could constitute an hour long video of the same kind?
There’s no way Mitt Romney would look this collected under heavy rainfall. Think of that awful corporate boardroom do, made all unkempt by nature’s just ablutions.
Reason enough, I’d have thought.
7 notes (via mediumdensity)
Seth Stephen-Davidowitz for the NYT:
I performed the somewhat unpleasant task of ranking states and media markets in the United States based on the proportion of their Google searches that included the word “nigger(s).” This word was included in roughly the same number of Google searches as terms like “Lakers,” “Daily Show,” “migraine” and “economist.”
Once I figured out which parts of the country had the highest racially charged search rates, I could test whether Mr. Obama underperformed in these areas. I predicted how many votes Mr. Obama should have received based on how many votes John Kerry received in 2004 plus the average gain achieved by other 2008 Democratic Congressional candidates. The results were striking: The higher the racially charged search rate in an area, the worse Mr. Obama did.
Add up the totals throughout the country, and racial animus cost Mr. Obama three to five percentage points of the popular vote. In other words, racial prejudice gave John McCain the equivalent of a home-state advantage nationally.
Read the full article here, check out the accompanying chart here
Really telling. Direct anyone to this article who denies that racism factors into this race or into commentary regarding President Obama. Racism is not dead in this country. Decades of oppression, slavery, and bigotry do not just disappear. Instituional and social inequities are still so deeply intrenched in this country. We have to continue acknowledging racism and working to fight it.
2 notes (via femminista)
Reading through my daily slew of news websites it’s hard to ignore the onslaught of articles regarding Obama’s ‘slip’ in an interview during which he said ’The private sector is doing fine’. One in particular, via MSNBC, caught my eye, not because of the issue in particular, rather for a comment on the treatment of the quotation itself. ’In context, the president was noting that the private sector is doing fine IN COMPARISON with the public sector, and the job numbers back that up. But in politics, the context often doesn’t matter.’
Perhaps in the world of sound bites ‘context often doesn’t matter’, but how is it that we have gone from ‘context is everything’ to ‘context often doesn’t matter’. Is this really the current state of media/politics/modern American thought that the greater context of a statement or idea is disregarded for the sake of manipulation in order to ‘win’. Wasn’t there once a time when knowing/researching the entirety of an issue was the standard of legitimacy? The emphasis on the world of ’politics’ is even more interesting because of its connotation that this world is one of its own, separate from some other more objective reality. I could think of no better way to describe this idea of ‘politics’ as arbitrary rule making/enforc(e)ing and power mongering that seems to define what was once Law.
Clearly this is a slippery slope into discussions of Law and the questioning of our mondern way of Being (casual subject matter nbd), but for now I’ll just leave it at this: if ‘context often doesn’t matter’, then what does?
Read the rest of the article here.
As usual, mainstream news media pouncing on the chance to misquote and misrepresent Obama and his “mistakes”…
1 note (via andmilestogo)
It’s kind of sad that it makes me so happy to hear a presidential candidate say this when really… it’s just common sense.
4 notes (via elamy)
Page 1 of 5